Currently in software industry there is too much demand to go-ahead with fixed price( FP) types of contract.Its always beneficial to the customers rather than service providers.
Following are three main types of FP contract I experienced in my software management experience and thought to share with you.
Following are three main types of FP contract I experienced in my software management experience and thought to share with you.
Types of Fixed Price Contracts:
There are three types of main fixed price contracts and they are:
1.
Firm fixed price (FFP): This type of contract is the mostly used contract type and is acceptable
by most of the organisations because the cost is already committed and is not subject to
change unless the scope of work changes. Any cost increases due to adverse
performance would be the responsibility of the customer.
2.
Fixed price incentive fee (FPIF): This type of contract
gives the customer and vendor some flexibility in that it allows for deviation
from performance, with a financial incentive for achieving certain metrics. The
incentives are related to cost, schedule, or the technical performance of the
seller. A price ceiling is set and any costs above that ceiling are the
responsibility of the vendor.
3.
Fixed price with economic price adjustment
(FP-EPA): This type of contracts are used for
long-term contracts and they allow for some pre-defined adjustments in the
contract price due to changed market conditions.
The fixed price projects can be successful with small scale
projects with clarity in requirements and scope of the feature is well defined.
In today’s mercurial market situation companies are breaking the long duration
and high cost project in to smaller and planning them to get executed with step
by step. Companies are not ready to go with huge investment due to market
situation, competition and unclear goals.
Overall it’s observed that, lack of product goal, unclear
requirements and limited budget is forcing companies to execute the fixed price
projects with agile methodology. Executing FP project with agile is suitable
for customers (buyers) but risky and less beneficial to vendors (sellers).
Customer are setting price for the project in advance and expecting the project
to be delivered with accepting the change requests. This is the reality of the
today’s market and no one go away from it. Here vendors need to come up with
some approaches to deal with this situation and continue with business by
gaining good profit and more projects.
Below section gives some typical approaches and tailoring of
the agile values to make the fixed contracts suitable to customers and vendors.
No comments:
Post a Comment